The Experimental Assembly of Structures in EVA and the Assembly Concept for Construction of Erectable Space Structures, or EASE/ACCESS, were a pair of space shuttle flight experiments that were performed on STS-61-B, on November 29 and December 1, 1985. The purpose of the experiments was to study how quickly astronauts would become proficient at assembling space structures during extravehicular activity, and how quickly they would become fatigued, and to explore various construction and maintenance techniques. In particular, researchers studied the applied moments of inertia arising in the manual assembly of a large space structure.[1][2]
EASE was a project of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and the Space Systems Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (later at the University of Maryland), while ACCESS was developed by NASA's Langley Research Center.[3]
Astronauts Jerry L. Ross and Sherwood C. Spring repeatedly assembled a 3.7-meter (12 ft) tetrahedral truss (EASE) and a triangular column truss (ACCESS) during two extra-vehicular activities (EVAs). The first EVA was devoted to studying human performance in assembly techniques, while the second was dedicated to supplementary experiments, including alternative construction techniques and maintenance scenarios.[4]
The EASE structure consisted of six identical aluminum beams, each 12 feet (3.7 m) long and with a mass of 64 pounds (29 kg), connected by four nodal joints. ACCESS consisted of 93 tubular aluminum struts, each 1-inch (25 mm) in diameter—thirty-three 4.5 feet (1.4 m) struts, and sixty 6 feet (1.8 m) struts—connected by thirty-three nodal joints.[4] While assembling the EASE structure, the astronauts moved about the structure under their own power. For the assembly of the ACCESS structure, the astronauts were secured to a mobile platform on the Remote Manipulator System, which was guided by astronaut Mary L. Cleave.[4]
A stereoscopic camera system recorded the movements of the structural beams during assembly. Taking into account the effects of inertia, drag, and virtual mass, researchers used this data to reconstruct the applied moments of inertia. The structure was also assembled in neutral buoyancy simulation, and the two environments were compared. The EVAs were also recorded by an IMAX camera mounted in the shuttle cargo bay.
Applied moments of inertia during EVA were found to be on the order of 2.0 newton-meters (1.5 lbf⋅ft). In neutral buoyancy simulation, the applied moments of inertia were around five times greater than those during EVA.[1] Assembly time during EVA was around 20% less than in neutral buoyancy simulation. The learning curve was on the order of 78%, and was unaffected by the strength, coordination, or size of the astronaut, or the fit of the space suit.[5] In both environments, moments of inertia were applied as short impulses, interspersed by several seconds of coasting.
The EASE/ACCESS experiments were deemed to be successful. The information gathered provided a basis for planning future manually assembled space structures, and in the process NASA accrued valuable EVA assembly experience. The team responsible for the EASE project was awarded a NASA Group Achievement Award.[6]
← 1984 · Orbital launches in 1985 · 1986 → | |
---|---|
Sakigake | Kosmos 1616 | Kosmos 1617 · Kosmos 1618 · Kosmos 1619 · Kosmos 1620 · Kosmos 1621 · Kosmos 1622 | Molniya-3 No.36 | Kosmos 1623 | Kosmos 1624 | Gorizont No.21L | Kosmos 1625 | Kosmos 1626 | STS-51-C (USA-8) | Kosmos 1627 | Kosmos 1628 | Meteor-2 No.13 | USA-9 | Arabsat-1A · Brasilsat A1 | Kosmos 1629 | Kosmos 1630 | Kosmos 1631 | Kosmos 1632 | Kosmos 1633 | Geosat | Kosmos 1634 | Kosmos 1635 · Kosmos 1636 · Kosmos 1637 · Kosmos 1638 · Kosmos 1639 · Kosmos 1640 · Kosmos 1641 · Kosmos 1642 | Ekran No.28L | Intelsat VA F-10 | Kosmos 1643 | Kosmos 1644 | STS-51-D (Anik C1 · Leasat 3) | Unnamed | Kosmos 1645 | Kosmos 1646 | Kosmos 1647 | Kosmos 1648 | Prognoz 10 | STS-51-B (Nusat) | GStar-1 · Telecom 1B | Kosmos 1649 | Kosmos 1650 · Kosmos 1651 · Kosmos 1652 | Kosmos 1653 | Kosmos 1654 | Molniya-3 No.39 | Kosmos 1655 | Kosmos 1656 | Soyuz T-13 | Kosmos 1657 | Kosmos 1658 | Kosmos 1659 | Kosmos 1660 | STS-51-G (Morelos 1 · Arabsat-1B · Telstar 3D · SPARTAN-101) | Kosmos 1661 | Kosmos 1662 | Progress 24 | Kosmos 1663 | Unnamed | Kosmos 1664 | Intelsat VA F-11 | Giotto | Kosmos 1665 | Kosmos 1666 | Kosmos 1667 | Kosmos 1668 | Molniya-3 No.37 | Kosmos 1669 | STS-51-F (PDP) | Kosmos 1670 | Kosmos 1671 | Transit-O 24 · Transit-O 30 | Kosmos 1672 · Kosmos 1672 | Kosmos 1673 | Kosmos 1674 | Gran' No.26L | Kosmos 1675 | Kosmos 1676 | Suisei | Molniya-1 No.61 | Kosmos 1677 | STS-51-I (Aussat A1 · ASC-1 · Leasat 4) | Unnamed | Kosmos 1678 | Kosmos 1679 | Kosmos 1680 | Kosmos 1681 | ECS-3 · Spacenet 3 | Soyuz T-14 | Kosmos 1682 | Kosmos 1683 | Kosmos 1684 | Kosmos 1685 | Kosmos 1686 | Intelsat VA F-12 | Kosmos 1687 | Kosmos 1688 | Kosmos 1689 | Molniya-3 No.38 | STS-51-J (USA-11 · USA-12) | USA-10 | Kosmos 1690 · Kosmos 1695 · Kosmos 1692 · Kosmos 1693 · Kosmos 1694 · Kosmos 1691 | Kosmos 1696 | Fanhui Shi Weixing 8 | Kosmos 1697 | Kosmos 1698 | Molniya-1 No.73 | Unnamed | Meteor-3 No.2 | Kosmos 1699 | Kosmos 1700 | Molniya-1 No.56 | STS-61-A (GLOMR) | Kosmos 1701 | Kosmos 1702 | Gran' No.28L | Kosmos 1703 | STS-61-B (Morelos 2 · Aussat A2 · Satcom K2 · OEX · EASE/ACCESS) | Kosmos 1704 | Kosmos 1705 | Kosmos 1706 | Kosmos 1707 | USA-13 · USA-14 | Kosmos 1708 | Kosmos 1709 | Molniya-3 No.40 | Kosmos 1710 · Kosmos 1711 · Kosmos 1712 | Meteor-2 No.14 | Kosmos 1713 | Kosmos 1714 | |
Payloads are separated by bullets ( · ), launches by pipes ( | ). Crewed flights are indicated in underline. Uncatalogued launch failures are listed in italics. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are denoted in (brackets). |